Parallel imports of medicinal products and medical devices – avoiding trademark infringement
Repackaging medicinal products and medical devices may infringe trademark rights
For medicinal products and medical devices, the trade mark owner has a particular interest in ensuring that the origin guarantee of its trade mark is not compromised (BGH, order of 06. 10. 2016 – I ZR 165/15 – Debrisoft). The risk of trade mark infringement is particularly high in the case of parallel imports of medicinal products and medical devices.
Parallel imports of medicines and medical devices require repackaging
On the other hand, medicinal products imported from abroad often have to be repackaged and relabelled. For example, a package leaflet in German must be included, and a safety feature and a pharmaceutical product number (PZN) identifying the “pharmaceutical entrepreneur” must be affixed to the packaging. Repackaging therefore does not always infringe trademark rights. According to the CJEU’s case law, a trademark owner cannot oppose the further distribution of a parallel-imported medicinal product if it has been repackaged, the trademark has been reapplied, and the other requirements are met.
According to settled case law, the specific subject matter of a trademark is to guarantee the origin of the goods bearing it. Repackaging goods by a third party without the trademark owner’s consent jeopardises this function of the trademark and may constitute trademark infringement (see Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 10 November 2016 - C 297/15 - Ferring Lægemidler). Anyone repackaging parallel-imported medicinal products risks receiving a warning letter for trademark infringement or facing an application for an interim injunction, unless they comply with certain requirements established by case law.
The practitioner’s handbook on advertising law for medicines, food supplements, health claims, foods for special medical purposes, medical devices and cosmetics — available from bookshops or Amazon
Advertising for health-related products is subject to particularly strict legal regulation. Courts set high standards for health-related claims. Advertising for medicines and other remedies, medical devices, food supplements, foods for special medical purposes and cosmetics is also restricted by specific laws and regulations. The risk of cease-and-desist notices and legal disputes is particularly high for these products. This book sets out the current legal position using several hundred examples from case law.
Contents:
- Selection of terms, texts and media
- Advertising with Trademarks
- General principles of competition law, misleading and comparative advertising, advertising with prices and discounts
- Search engine optimisation and search engine advertising, social media and influencer marketing
- General requirements for health-related advertising
- Prohibitions and restrictions under medicines advertising law
- Advertising for medicinal products, pharmaceutical price controls, and advertising discounts and benefits
- Advertising medical devices
- Advertising food supplements, especially HEALTH CLAIMS
- Advertising for foods for special medical purposes
- Advertising for cosmetic products
Back to table of contents
1st edition, November 2024, 408 pages, XchangeIP Verlag, available from bookshops or Amazon
ISBN 978-3-00-079406-3
Permissible repackaging of parallel-imported medicinal products and medical devices
Trademark-relevant “repackaging”
A trademark infringement therefore first requires that there has been relevant repackaging. Repackaging parallel-imported medicinal products and medical devices includes relabelling (Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 26. 4. 2007 - C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim/Swingward Ltd). However, repackaging requires that the packaging be altered. Attaching a small sticker showing the parallel importer’s contact details, barcode and pharmaceutical central number to an unprinted part of the unopened packaging does not amount to repackaging (Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 17.5.2018 – C-642/16 Junek/Lohmann & Rauscher). Even covering the manufacturer’s barcode and pharmaceutical central number with a parallel importer’s sticker does not constitute repackaging. Unlike a trademark, the pharmaceutical central number does not guarantee the origin of the goods; rather, it is used to organise the distribution of goods through pharmacies and facilitate pharmacies’ billing with health insurers (Federal Court of Justice, judgment of 11.10.2018 – I ZR 259/15 – Curapor; Federal Court of Justice, judgment of 11.10.2018 – I ZR 178/15 - Gazin).
Repackaging parallel-imported medicines and medical devices is permitted under certain conditions
Even where repackaging is relevant under trade mark law, repackaging parallel-imported medicinal products and medical devices is permitted under certain conditions (see ECJ, judgment of 11 July 1996 – Joined Cases C–427/93, C–429/93 and C–436/93 – Bristol-Myers Squibb):
- The assertion of a trademark by its owner contributes to an artificial partitioning of markets between Member States. This is particularly the case where the trademark owner has marketed the same medicinal product in different packaging in different Member States, and repackaging by the importer is necessary both to enable the product to be marketed in the Member State of import and is carried out under conditions that cannot affect the product’s original condition;
- repackaging cannot affect the original condition of the goods contained in the packaging;
- the new packaging clearly states who repackaged the medicinal product and who the manufacturer is;
- the repackaged medicinal product is not presented in a way that could damage the reputation of the trade mark and its proprietor. The packaging must therefore not be damaged, poor quality or untidy;
- the importer has informed the trademark owner in advance of the planned offer of the repackaged medicine and, upon request, supplies a sample of the repackaged product.
Repackaging into pack sizes or standard sizes required under national law
A trade mark proprietor cannot prevent the repackaging of parallel-imported medicinal products and medical devices, even if packs of the size used in the EEA Member State where the importer purchased the goods cannot be sold in the importing state, in particular because only packs of a specific size are permitted there or a corresponding national practice exists, because health insurance reimbursement rules make coverage of treatment costs dependent on pack size, or because established prescribing practices are based, among other things, on standard pack sizes recommended by professional associations and health insurance providers (Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 10 November 2016 – C-297/15 – Ferring Lægemidler A/S/Orifarm A/S).
However, repackaging parallel-imported medicinal products is not necessary if the packaging can simply be opened, a German-language package leaflet inserted, and the outer packaging resealed with a new security feature (OLG Cologne of 5.12.2018 - 6 W 121/18 - 0.75 mg tablet).
> MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MEDICINAL PRODUCT BRANDS
Author: Thomas Seifried, Trademark Law Attorney and Specialist Attorney for Intellectual Property Law
Trademark cease-and-desist letter for repackaging parallel-imported medicinal products and medical devices
Cease-and-desist letters from trademark owners and licensees
Trademark owners and their licensees often take action against parallel imports, claiming that these constitute trademark infringement by issuing a cease-and-desist letter under trademark law or taking the matter to court, usually seeking an interim injunction. These cases concern the legal principle of "trademark exhaustion". The details matter. Not every act of repackaging constitutes trademark infringement. Get in touch with us.
Thomas Seifried, specialist lawyer for intellectual property law
Trademark lawyer Thomas Seifried has over 20 years of experience in trademark law, with numerous notable successes, and has also been a Certified Specialist Lawyer in Intellectual Property Law since 2007. He has advised and represented businesses in the healthcare and cosmetics sectors for many years.
